"The Finish" a new
book by Mark Bowden author of “Black Hawk Down”, says that President Obama
wanted to put Osama bin Laden on trial. Obama expected bin Laden to go down
fighting according to Bowden. As to why Obama wanted to put bin Laden on trial Bowden quotes the President as saying, "Frankly, my belief was if we had
captured him, that I would be in a pretty strong position politically here,
to argue that displaying due process and rule of law would be our best weapon
against al-Qaida in preventing him from appearing as a martyr".
But was capture ever
a realistic possibility?
US
officials have said the Navy SEAL team was ordered to capture bin Laden if he
surrendered or kill him if he threatened them. Bowden asserts the SEALs could
have taken bin Laden alive but had no intention of doing so.
Contrary to what had been reported Matt
Bissonnette, a member of the SEAL team that killed bin Laden, and author of “
No Easy Day: The Firsthand Account of theMission That Killed Osama bin Laden”, says that night the “point man” saw
a man poking his head out and shot at him. The SEALs then went slowly to the
room and entered. They found a man lying on the floor, “In his death throes, he
was still twitching and convulsing,” Bissonnette goes on to say, “Another
assaulter and I trained our lasers on his chest and fired several rounds. The
bullets tore into him, slamming his body into the floor until he was
motionless.” Unconfirmed sources also assert that taking bin Laden alive
was never going to happen – bin Laden knew too much. Bissonnette’s account
seems to substantiate that.
Dead men
tell no lies.
While our elected representatives “come and go” there are
people who “remain in place” no matter which party is in power. There are
“those” who are consistently appointed to positions of power and influence – no
matter what their political affiliations may be. Why? Where does their first loyalty
lie?
Whose interests do they represent?
What “strings” won't they pull at the behest of
their masters? To what lengths will they go to “hide” their machinations and
manipulations from the public? And if something “leaks” out it's discounted, dismissed
and labeled as the product of “conspiracy theorist”. What happens to
individuals who are suspected as being a source, or a potential source, of a
“leak”? How many witnesses to the
JFK assassination died? And what was the
probability of the unnatural death of those
witnesses?
There are those who assert that bin Laden was a CIA “intelligence
asset” – assigned the name Tim Osman – and that he “toured” the U. S.
A former British Foreign secretary,
Robin Cook said: “Bin Laden was, though, a product of a monumental miscalculation by
western security agencies. Throughout the 80s he was armed by the CIA and
funded by the Saudis to wage jihad against the Russian occupation of
Afghanistan.”
There are claims that the CIA knew bin Laden’s “whereabouts”
and that in July 2001 a CIA head of station actually met with bin Laden at the
American Hospital in Dubai,UAE.
CBS’s Dan Rather reported that bin Laden,
who was on the FBI’s most wanted list at that time, was back in the hospital,
one day before the 9/11 attacks. Is it conceivable that
Dan Rather could know this but the FBI and the “intelligence community” did not?
Then there are those who claim that bin Laden was already
dead – that he had died years before; and that the 9/11 attack was actually a
“false flag” event.
According to Paul
Joseph Watson, of
infowars.com, “Top US government insider Dr. Steve R.
Pieczenik, a man who held numerous different influential positions under three
different Presidents and still works with the Defense Department, shockingly
told The Alex Jones Show yesterday that Osama Bin Laden died in 2001…”, he goes
on to say that “…Pieczenik served as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State
under three different administrations, Nixon, Ford and Carter, while also
working under Reagan and Bush senior, and still works as a consultant for the
Department of Defense. A former US Navy Captain, Pieczenik achieved two
prestigious Harry C. Solomon Awards at the
Harvard
Medical School
as he simultaneously completed a PhD at MIT.”
Are these claims nothing more than the “product” of
conspiracy theorists - as some allege? What are we to believe? All we know for
certain is that bin Laden was not captured and tried. And if Bissonnette is to
be believed, bin Laden was unarmed and “dispatched” while lying on his back - notwithstanding
the order to capture him. Was the man killed that night the “real” bin Laden or
a double – put in place because bin Laden had died? Was the “real” bin Laden
silenced that night because there were those who knew if he was captured there
was the potential that he could reveal information validating assertions that
bin Laden had connections to and was still working with individuals in the
intelligence community? Was there a secret “counter” order to assassinate bin Laden?
Did Bissonnette give us a clue? Letting us
know that bin Laden was unarmed and executed while
lying wounded on the floor which is contrary to the administrations original assertions that bin Laden was
killed while resisting capture.
What do you think?